Do it because it’s fun?

Dean Shareski wrote a post back in February of 2011 entitled “What does joy have to do with learning?”  I am sure when Dean finished the post he did not necessarily think it would be one of his most memorable, but it was with me.  It has stuck with me ever since I have read it.  I am guilty of often doing things in class just because they are fun…but not so much this year.  You know…things are changing…less fun….more rigor.

This week we did something just for fun.  We spent way too long on the Donner Party story.  We were going to finish it off with a very simple assignment that was supposed to last 20 minutes.  Come into class, pretend there is a movie coming out on the Donner Party, and write a script for the movie trailer, and move on.   After the first class started it, I noticed they were having a lot of fun with it.  They were putting in much more effort and thought than I would have predicted.  I just wanted them to summarize the essence of the Donner Party story, and basically turn their thesis for their essay (not so fun) into something fancy and memorable.  The first class decided they wanted to be creative, spend more than 15 minutes on them, and we decided to record them with music the next day…so a fifteen minute activity turned into a two period activity.

We had a lot of fun recording them, and they had a lot of fun listening to them afterwards.  When they walked in I played 10 seconds of six songs,  they had to pick one and come up and read their script which could be no longer than 30 seconds.  We then popped in the music.  To finish in one period we had to average no more than 90 seconds a kid from start to finish.  It would have been nice to have heard the whole music piece, rehearse it to the music, try the script with different music…and maybe even take the time to put it to video with images…but that would have been another three days at least, and well…too much fun gets in the way of the rigor.

I have included some samples below.  They are  my favorites for various reasons, three are from kids who have never ever handed in anything on time, one from someone who never had the courage to record something live before, and a couple because there lines are so witty that you have to know something about the Donner Party to catch the hidden meaning.  I will end this post with the same words from Dean’s post:

With regards to creating a product like the ones below do you:

  1. Do it because it’s not only fun but likely does address some curricular outcomes but you might have to look them up later. Fingers crossed.
  2. Do it and to heck with the outcomes, doing joyful things with students is important.
  3. Do it but perhaps as an extra-curricular activity because you’re not sure where it fits with a robust curriculum but still think it’s important.
  4. Not do it at all.










What should teachers study?

What should teachers study?

Study oneself.

When the 2.0 phase of the internet started I read everything by every educational blogger out there and listened to every podcast (remember those?).   When I found one that I liked I read every post, and listened to every podcast…not just the latest one tweeted out, and not just the last few on the home page.  I would go all the way back to the beginning which obviously easier to do back then.  These people (David Warlick, Kevin Honeycutt, Will Richardson, Wesley Fryer, and Ginger Lewman…and others I can no longer remember) changed me.  I didn’t pick up tips, or lesson ideas, or resources…they changed the way I thought, acted, and processed information.  They did not change how I taught, they changed who I was, and that changed how I taught.

If someone someday sifts through my posts, I hope that is what they might say about this blog.  Take away the posts that moan and complain(which seem to be more frequent), and the few that are very step-by-step “here is what we did in class,” and I hope the impression that is left upon the readers is that if you seek change in your classroom, the first thing you have to do,  is change oneself.  Many hunts for technology, hours spent on twitter, or weeks planning units often are done in an attempt to find something that makes up for our weaknesses…ignoring what we need to change. We spend time trying to find technology to connect our class with the world, when what we simply might seek is a connection with the kids sitting right in front of us.  Sometimes I wonder if we even know what we are truly seeking.

That is the hidden, and sometimes blatant message here.  No special piece of technology, no magical process, no wonder organizer or schedule change will ever make a bigger impact on your kids, than simply changing oneself.

And it is always nice when someone else agrees :)

We teach life…

What good is information if it does not change the way you act,  treat other people, or change who you are?

Our school like many others in a big push to collect data, use data to change our instruction, and use data to judge students and teachers.  Obviously the data we focus on are the specific parts of the state standardized test that our students show weaknesses in.  We collect spreadsheets of data, run 100s of scantron sheets through the computer, and meet in teams to figure out how to make the numbers go higher.

Through all of this the students have become become detached from their numbers.  I know more about them, but somehow I no longer know them.  I have become detached from the kids by focusing on the information I collect on them.  In a strange way, the more information I have collected on them, the less I have been able to help them.

This year I have been also more careful to cover all of the items listed in the curriculum.  I am being more careful this year because I can see someone sitting me down at the end of the year and asking did you cover this, did you cover that…   This year my kids have learned about more events, people, and places than in the previous years.  There is more information in their heads, but I don’t feel as though they have changed “who they are” as much.

So I have more information on them, they have more information and skills from class, but yet something is missing.

What good is information if it does not change the way you act,  treat other people, or change who you are?

In the past, there was a moral underpinning to our class.  It wasn’t a history class.  It was a class about life.  We took the time to figure out how new information that we acquired could be used to change the way we act, treat other people, and in turn it would change who we were.  We all had a common learning experience and the product at the end of units was personal–sometimes the final product might not even include any information from the unit but only a plan for how the information would be put into use to change the world, change others, or change ourselves.  This year with a greater emphasis on data, shorter class periods, and fewer common times in which the kids could come back for help, I have come to the conclusion that what I am doing this year is not working.  To fit into the tighter schedule I just dropped many components of my past classes that made the biggest difference but were not listed in the “curriculum.”  Instead I should have figured out how to keep the components that made the biggest impact and distill everything down to fit into the shorter periods.

In the end, my kids will never even notice.  They will never feel cheated, they’ll never feel as though their experience in my class wasn’t what it could have been.  The guilt just sits with me, and at least now that I have clearly identified what has been bugging me I can work on fixing it for next year (and the last two months of this year).

I have an 1849 copy of an annual report from the Massachusetts Board of Education.  Back then local school districts would certify teachers (don’t know how widespread that was outside of New England).  In the report it lists the qualifications that districts needed to consider before certifying a candidate.  One of them was “Moral Qualifications.”  In order to become a teacher you were required to instill virtues into your students.  I know…for those of you with some background in this, it was Horace Mann who insisted on these “Christian values” and I am not advocating “making” kids moral but simply putting them in situations in which they get to develop their own.  Put them into situations in which the information being used in class might change the way they act, change how they  treat other people, or change who they are.

Our kids are all getting something out of our classes bigger than our subject.  They are all getting a lesson in life.  How to act.  How to treat other people.  Who they are.

We all teach life.  What are kids learning about life from your class?

 

After I finished this post I had a flashback to a post I once wrote entitled “I teach life.”  Unfortunately the search on my blog wasn’t working so I tried Google and ended up finding something much better.  I ended up finding a reflection on my class from a past student.  Ahhhh…perfect timing.  I needed to hear it from a kid…I need to change what I am doing:

On the first day of eighth grade, I walked into Mr. Bogush’s social studies classroom. He was the only teacher I had ever seen armed with a guitar and a Dr. Seuss book. I already knew that he was going to be different from every other teacher that I had ever had. Throughout the school year, Mr. Bogush inspired not only me, but so many of my fellow students.

I remember one day, when I walked in to ask a question, Mr. Bogush whirled around and told me that I was born to become a teacher. He was right. I had always wanted to be a teacher. While in this class I learned so much. Not only did I learn about Lewis and Clark, but we had to BE them. Whatever we were doing, it was always creative and fun. We made videos and presentations. I was surprised at how social studies could be so fun.

At the end of the year, I realized that Mr. Bogush hadn’t only taught us about social studies, but gave us life skills that we would use forever. He gave us great memories. Mr. Bogush always told us some very important things.

One- if somebody told us that we needed to get ready for the real world, we could say told us that we were already there. Where else would we be? Two- If we were going to fail, then fail big. I know that I will be able to take these lessons through the rest of my life.

On the very last day, Mr. Bogush sang us a song. It made everyone cry. He gave us crayons and if you listen to the song, you would know why. I just wanted everybody to know what a great teacher Mr. Bogush is. If you have him, then you are very lucky. I will always remember being in his class and he will always be my favorite teacher. –the web address to the song is http://blogush.edublogs.org/2011/06/26/good-enough

~Hayley Comstock

 Thanks Hayley…you were born to be a teacher, and you just told me something that I really needed to hear as well…to not just teach “Social studies,” but to impart life skills, memories, and lessons that will be kept within a student’s heart for the rest of their life.

 

Jury Duty

Yesterday I went downtown for jury duty.  Unlike most of the people there, I am not annoyed by having jury duty…except the fact that this time it happened to fall on a day off from school.  I have been called for duty three other times, and only once was I brought in for voir dire.  The whole trial by your peers is a pretty crazy process if you think about it…Canada is the only other country in the world that has a similar system (right?).  

I was probably the only person there who wanted to get on a jury.  I think it would be the most incredible professional development.  Of course I assumed just like the other times I had been called that I would just sit around all day so I stuffed my backpack with all the kids research papers that should have been graded last week.  Within two hours I was called down with twenty-four people to a be interviewed for a trial that need two more jurors for a 6 member panel.   The judge first talks to everyone, and then folks are brought in one at a time to be interviewed by the lawyers.  I was the first person to interviewed.  I knew I had to start off by making a good first impression because I really, really wanted to be on this jury because it was going to be a short case and I would only miss about four days of school.

 I was brought in, sat in the little booth, and the questions started…

Defense Attorney:  I see you have 6+ years of college, where did you attend?
Me: I went to Stonehill College for my undergrad, Southern Connecticut State University for my Masters, and for my sixth year…for my sixth year…sorry sir after spending 10s of thousands of dollars and two years of my life there I just can’t seem to remember (I failed to mention that later today I was actually speaking at the open house of the school I received my 6th Year).

Ok…thought lost my shot but I came back strong…

Defense Attorney:  Will it be any inconvenience to serve on the jury?
Me: I’ll get 4 extra hours of sleep each morning, will be home on time each day, won’t have any planning to do at night, an hour lunch–just any chance to have a real lunch is nice, constant breaks, a shorter drive, and won’t need lesson plans done for the day I return because I’ll just talk about my experience…sir, I beg you to pick me.  

Ahhh…I didn’t want to seem needy!  I had to recover on the next question…

Prosecutor: Will you be able to make a decision based on the evidence, and be able to tell when something is obviously not true?  Just like sometimes when a student comes up to you with an excuse and you know it’s not true?
Me: I don’t jump to conclusions even when something seems unlikely, that is very important when dealing with kids..
Judge cuts in: Yes, but if a student said they couldn’t hand in their homework because they were attacked by aliens…
Me: I’d ask to see the wounds.
Prosecutor: How about if they say their dog ate their homework?
Me: I have seen bites taken out of papers that could not be identified as human.  Sir, I look at all the evidence before jumping to conclusions.  

It went on for another 10-15 minutes.  It seemed like I was being asked many of the same questions over and over, all of them with obvious answers, which made me wonder exactly what they were looking for.  It could not be my answers.  The tone of my voice?  My body language? 

When it was over I was asked to step out of the room…and minutes later was told I was chosen.  I am very excited about it because in some weird way I feel more “American” getting the chance to take part in this process…and did I mention four extra hours of sleep each day and an hour lunch!


When You Thought I Wasn’t Looking

There is a poem that I have seen attributed to Connie Black entitled When You Thought I Wasn’t Looking.  I have always wanted to re-write it from the perspective of a student …enjoy.

When You Thought I Wasn’t Looking
When you thought I wasn’t looking, I saw you laugh with Cindy who no one else laughs with, and I wanted to laugh too.
When you thought I wasn’t looking, I saw you ask  Mark who always sits in the corner to sit a little closer, and I thought it was good to be kind and include everyone.
When you thought I wasn’t looking, I saw you give a compliment to Keisha who never receives one, and I knew that kind words make a difference.
When you thought I wasn’t looking, I saw you pat Eddie on the back as he walked out of class, and I knew that little things are special things.
When you thought I wasn’t looking, I heard you ask Billy why he was absent yesterday, and I knew that you missed us when we were not in class.
When you thought I wasn’t looking, I saw your tear when I presented, and I felt loved.
When you thought I wasn’t looking, I saw that you cared, and I wanted to be everything that I could be.
When you thought I wasn’t looking, I LOOKED….and wanted to say thanks for all the things I saw when you thought I wasn’t looking.